Neuromancer -- William Gibson



Neuromancer (Though not the same cover I have)

ISBN-10: 0441569595
ISBN-13: 978-0441569595

Rating:




Sometimes you come across a story that exceeds your expectations, no matter how high or low they might be. Not because of their sheer awesomeness, but because of their depth. Because of how far the story is taken, how much it encompasses, how large it grows to be. For me, Neuromancer was such a story.

I am the type of reader who always tries to guess where the story will go next (and I have a fairly high success rate, but probably only because I modify my guess every time I find out something new). With Neuromancer . . . well, I could have never guessed where it was going to go, it's just goes so far beyond. And this is a good thing.

Neuromancer is part of the sub-genre to Science Fiction called Cyberpunk (yes, it's not just a style of fashion; in fact, I believe the fashion is based upon the literary genre--but I could be wrong). The book is actually the beginning of the genre; it was so far beyond what had come before it that a new label had to be created to describe it. Having read it, I can certainly understand why. Gibson redefines the Internet (introducing the term "cyberspace") and introduces the idea of exploring the capability and the possibilities that come with Artificial Intelligences.

Neuromancer is a one of those stories that takes place all over the world--Japan to the US to Turkey to Space colonies, as well as the vast expanse of what we call the Internet. Or perhaps even what Gibson envisioned the Internet evolving into. In this, it becomes a journey of epic proportions. And in this, I perhaps find one failing of the book that actually irks me. The main character, although he seems to evolve dynamically through the entirety of the book, ends up falling back into the same lifestyle he lived just prior to the beginning of the story. As if waiting for some cycle to reoccur (though I would hope that he is smart enough that it will not, but who knows? That, in some ways, is left up for the reader to guess at). There is no real demonstration to either side, that he has or has not learned some lesson through the fate that led him on the crazy journey that is Neuromancer. Though in another way, it seems a strange sort of closure; the character can be nothing more than what he is, and he has always seemed to be defined by his abilities to traverse cyberspace more than any force of personality--and perhaps that is the true failing here (and perhaps what another character is getting at when he implies that the main character is easily predictable).


The book is probably not for everyone. You have to be a substantial geek for computers (or just have a fascination, it isn't the terminology that will get you, it's just whether or not you find it interesting), to really keep up with the book. The concept of traveling the Internet with the mind is one I find interesting on several levels; the psychology of it, the neurology of it, the spirituality of it--all of which are touched on in one way or another through the course of the book.

Of course, you could be like me and have something as trivial as "street samurai" tip you over the edge. Though, that is definitely not what kept me reading. ;3

Where does the BBC get the info for this statistic anyway?



The BBC believes most people will have read only 6 of the 100 books here. How do your reading habits stack up? Instructions: Copy this into your NOTES. Look at the list and put an 'x' after those you have read. Tag other book nerds...

Edit: After thinking about it, I've added an "O" for ones that I own and haven't gotten to reading yet. And a "~" for ones I intend to pick up when I see them and have the means.


1. Pride and Prejudice - Jane Austen -
2. The Lord of the Rings - JRR Tolkien - X
3. Jane Eyre - Charlotte Bronte -
4. Harry Potter series - JK Rowling - X
5. To Kill a Mockingbird - Harper Lee -
6. The Bible – X
7. Wuthering Heights - Emily Bronte -
8. Nineteen Eighty Four - George Orwell - ~
9. His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman -
10. Great Expectations - Charles Dickens - ~

Total: 2

11. Little Women - Louisa M Alcott - X
12. Tess of the D’Urbervilles - Thomas Hardy -
13. Catch 22 - Joseph Heller -
14. Complete Works of Shakespeare -
15. Rebecca - Daphne Du Maurier -
16. The Hobbit - JRR Tolkien - X
17. Birdsong - Sebastian Faulk -
18. Catcher in the Rye - JD Salinger -
19. The Time Traveler’s Wife - Audrey Niffenegger - ~
20. Middlemarch - George Eliot-

Total so far: 4

21. Gone With The Wind - Margaret Mitchell -
22. The Great Gatsby - F Scott Fitzgerald - X
23. Bleak House - Charles Dickens -
24. War and Peace - Leo Tolstoy -
25. The Hitch Hiker’s Guide to the Galaxy - Douglas Adams - ~
27. Crime and Punishment - Fyodor Dostoyevsky -
28. Grapes of Wrath - John Steinbeck -
29. Alice in Wonderland - Lewis Carroll - X
30. The Wind in the Willows - Kenneth Grahame -

Total so far: 6

31. Anna Karenina - Leo Tolstoy -
32. David Copperfield - Charles Dickens - X
33. Chronicles of Narnia - CS Lewis – X
34. Emma - Jane Austen -
35. Persuasion - Jane Austen -
36. The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe - CS Lewis - X
37. The Kite Runner - Khaled Hosseini - ~
38. Captain Corelli’s Mandolin - Louis De Bernieres
39. Memoirs of a Geisha - Arthur Golden - X
40. Winnie the Pooh - AA Milne - ~

Total so far: 10

41. Animal Farm - George Orwell -
42. The Da Vinci Code - Dan Brown - O
43. One Hundred Years of Solitude - Gabriel Garcia Marquez -
44. A Prayer for Owen Meany - John Irving -
45. The Woman in White - Wilkie Collins -
46. Anne of Green Gables - LM Montgomery - X
47. Far From The Madding Crowd - Thomas Hardy -
48. The Handmaid’s Tale - Margaret Atwood -
49. Lord of the Flies - William Golding -
50. Atonement - Ian McEwan -

Total so far: 11

51. Life of Pi - Yann Martel -
52. Dune - Frank Herbert - O
53. Cold Comfort Farm - Stella Gibbons -
54. Sense and Sensibility - Jane Austen -
55. A Suitable Boy - Vikram Seth -
56. The Shadow of the Wind - Carlos Ruiz Zafon -
57. A Tale Of Two Cities - Charles Dickens - ~
58. Brave New World - Aldous Huxley -
59. The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night Time - Mark Haddon - O
60. Love In The Time Of Cholera - Gabriel Garcia Marquez-

Total so far: 11

61. Of Mice and Men - John Steinbeck - ~
62. Lolita - Vladimir Nabokov -
63. The Secret History - Donna Tartt -
64. The Lovely Bones - Alice Sebold - O
65. Count of Monte Cristo - Alexandre Dumas - ~
66. On The Road - Jack Kerouac -
67. Jude the Obscure - Thomas Hardy -
68. Bridget Jones’s Diary - Helen Fielding -
69. Midnight’s Children - Salman Rushdie -
70. Moby Dick - Herman Melville - X

Total so far: 12

71. Oliver Twist - Charles Dickens - O
72. Dracula - Bram Stoker - [will never read, but I tried]
73. The Secret Garden - Frances Hodgson Burnett - X
74. Notes From A Small Island - Bill Bryson -
75. Ulysses - James Joyce -
76. The Inferno - Dante - ~
77. Swallows and Amazons - Arthur Ransome -
78. Germinal - Emile Zola -
79. Vanity Fair - William Makepeace Thackeray -
80. Possession - AS Byatt -

Total so far: 13

81. A Christmas Carol - Charles Dickens -
82. Cloud Atlas - David Mitchell -
83. The Color Purple - Alice Walker -
84. The Remains of the Day - Kazuo Ishiguro-
85. Madame Bovary - Gustave Flaubert -
86. A Fine Balance - Rohinton Mistry -
87. Charlotte’s Web - EB White - X
88. The Five People You Meet In Heaven - Mitch Albom -
89. Adventures of Sherlock Holmes - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle-
90. The Faraway Tree Collection - Enid Blyton -

Total so far: 14

91. Heart of Darkness - Joseph Conrad - X
92. The Little Prince - Antoine De Saint-Exupery -
93. The Wasp Factory - Iain Banks -
94. Watership Down - Richard Adams -
95. A Confederacy of Dunces - John Kennedy Toole -
96. A Town Like Alice - Nevil Shute -
97. The Three Musketeers - Alexandre Dumas - X
98. Hamlet - William Shakespeare - X
99. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory - Roald Dahl - X
100. Les Miserables - Victor Hugo-

Total: 18

. . . more than six? I've read other books by a lot of the authors on here as well, though not necessarily the ones listed.

Apathy and Other Small Victories -- Paul Neilan



Apathy and Other Small Victories

ISBN-10: 0312352190
ISBN-13: 978-0312352196

Rating:




This book was recommended to me a bit hesitantly by a friend. Hesitantly because my taste is known to be at times almost random and she wasn't sure the type of humor in the book would quite fit to me. I have since decided the best way to describe the humor is something along the lines of calling it "a book narrated by the village idiot."

I liked it, though.


It's really sort of difficult to describe the plot, because it's a book where things aren't always as they seem. I think instead it's more fruitful to describe the main character and let you traverse the plot line on your own. And so I shall attempt to try.

Shane. A man who is as brilliant as he is dumb, perhaps a clear illustration of just how close genius and stupidity can really come. Cynical, witty, and good at running from both the truth and responsibility. His main defining trait is his apathy, or so he might say, personally I think his tendency to run from things is. And the entire book is spent running, though Shane never seems to know what he is running from exactly at any point. The force of paranoia is strong in this one, maybe some other cocktail of delusions besides.

The cast is fleshed out by a pair of asshole police detectives, an abusive "girlfriend," his dentist's deaf and smartass assistant, a landlord and fellow renters that seem handpicked from a bad Hollywood movie, and a myraid of other small characters whom Shane always picks the most colorful points to embellish on.

Shane is really good at embellishment. And being witty about it. Dramatic too.


The sort of humor the book is written in is that sharp wit, can cut like a knife if you take it too seriously. The characters are bizarrely ridiculous, and the writing style is like the rambling of a babbler. Not quite stream-of-consciousness, more like a person who says everything and nothing at all. Mixed with a bit of the nature of a compulsive liar. It's interesting, really ties the cast of unlikely characters and the book itself together. Shane's narrative makes it larger than life, dramatic, colorful--and then the reality behind things peaks through every once in awhile, just enough to keep you grounded and from flying to far off into his paranoid delusions.

I personally found the contrast intriguing. But I like that sort of thing. The humor can be a bit stupid at times, but even a reader who prefers things on the serious side (me) was able to enjoy it. So you might consider giving it a try :3.

Lost Gods Series -- Megan Derr (Maderr)



Book One: Treasure
Book Two: Burning Bright
Book Three: Stone Rose
Book Four: Poison
Book Five: Chaos

Rating:




This is a series I have re-read a few times now, I find it very enjoyable. There are a few formatting errors, as well as other errors that I think have just come from transferring a manuscript to a web page format. However, the story itself has always been enough to overcome these errors, at least for me, and I have always been a little asinine when it comes to mistakes in text.

This series undertakes the daunting task of creating a unique and complex world. Although Derr doesn't take it nearly so far as Tolkien (and really, few do; moreso that much detail is not necessary to tell a good story, with most authors it would merely complicate it excessively), there is more than enough detail to bring it to life. Each of the individual countries has inspiration from real life places (if you don't see it, look at the names, because that's where it is mostly), and it's part of the fun (for me) to discover these little references.

The basic plot is not necessarily anything new to fantasy, but really, almost everything has been done before, it's all in the execution these days. The story is about the revival of the gods in Derr's world that fell 1000 years in the past. Although the endings are usually somewhat predictable (but not from the very beginning, and every so often there are some truly magnificent plot twists), it still makes for an enjoyable read. They're the type of predictions that just make sense.

The series is mostly lighthearted in the beginning, but becomes more tragic as it progresses and more of the story of how the gods fell to begin with starts to unfold. Although the ending is a far cry from being "sad," the tone of the later stories is definitely more . . . bittersweet.

Recommended for those who like fantasy, but have the time for a long read. This is the type of story for light, leisure reading, however. Not the type suited for complex analysis and debate. Things simply are what they are. Relax and enjoy. And sometimes that's just the sort of thing one needs :).


(And Cassie. There is a unicorn "god" in one of them ;)).

The Magic of the Story



I've wondered from time to time, as a reader and especially as someone who likes to write, just what makes a good story.

Is it the plot?

Is it the writing itself? (The tone, or all the other tons of small technical details that we use to pick apart and describe our own language.)

Is it just something about the writer that comes through somehow in a bunch of printed characters on a screen or a page?


Or maybe it's some magic that comes from the reader themselves.



I think it's probably all of these. And it's interesting, because if you look closely enough you can tell which writers pick up on this and which ones don't. Which ones take these things into account; especially the last, realizing that the story belongs to the reader just as much as to themselves.